Nutrition Research
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 271-280, March 2005

Undernutrition without malnutrition as a protective factor to prevent DNA damage in the elderly

  • Víctor M. Mendoza-Núñez

      Affiliations

    • Gerontology and Research Unit, FES-Zaragoza, UNAM, México City 09230, México
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Tel.: +52 55 5639 6914; fax: +52 55 5639 6914.
  • ,
  • Martha A. Sánchez-Rodríguez

      Affiliations

    • Gerontology and Research Unit, FES-Zaragoza, UNAM, México City 09230, México
  • ,
  • Raquel Retana-Ugalde

      Affiliations

    • Gerontology and Research Unit, FES-Zaragoza, UNAM, México City 09230, México
  • ,
  • Luis A. Vargas-Guadarrama

      Affiliations

    • Anthropology Research Institute, UNAM, México City 09230, México
  • ,
  • Mario A. Altamirano-Lozano

      Affiliations

    • Genetic and Environmental Toxicology Research Unit, FES-Zaragoza, UNAM, México City 09230, México

Received 9 December 2003; received in revised form 18 October 2004; accepted 17 November 2004.

Abstract 

Caloric restriction (CR), undernutrition without malnutrition, is a successful method of extending the life span and reducing the incidence of several diseases. In animals, CR can reach 40% with beneficial effects, whereas in human beings, CR must be moderate (only 10%-20%) to avoid health risks. We have examined whether undernutrition without malnutrition is a protective factor for DNA damage in the elderly. The sample included a total of 260 older subjects: 96 well-nourished subjects, 52 subjects with undernutrition without malnutrition (CR 10%-20%), and 112 overweight subjects, all diagnosed as clinically healthy. DNA damage in peripheral blood lymphocytes was assessed through an alkaline unicellular electrophoresis procedure (comet assay). Fifty-six percent of the well-nourished subjects, 38% of the CR, and 44% of the overweight had DNA damage. Odds ratio (OR) of logistic regression analysis for DNA damage were: gender (men; OR 2.1, 95% CI [confidence interval] 1.19-3.71, P < .01), age (≥70 years; OR 1.7, 95% CI 1.05-3.02, P = .03), overweight (body mass index ≥27; OR 0.67, 95% CI 0.38-1.19, P = .18) and CR subjects (OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.19-0.82, P < .01). The groups of CR women and 60- to 69-year olds had a lower percentage of DNA damage than CR men and 70-year olds, respectively (P < .01 and P < .001). Present results suggest that a 10% to 20% CR is a protective factor for DNA damage in elderly people and that CR has better effects on women and on subjects aged 60 and 69 years.

Keywords: Caloric restriction, DNA damage, Elderly, Comet assay

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0271-5317(05)00016-3

doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2004.11.005

Nutrition Research
Volume 25, Issue 3 , Pages 271-280, March 2005