Nutrition Research
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 100-105, February 2009

Greater satiety response with resistant starch and corn bran in human subjects

  • Holly J. Willis

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MN 55108, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Tel.: +1 612 624 7234; fax: +1 612 625 5272.
  • ,
  • Alison L. Eldridge

      Affiliations

    • General Mills Inc, Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USA
  • ,
  • Jeannemarie Beiseigel

      Affiliations

    • General Mills Inc, Bell Institute of Health and Nutrition, Minneapolis, MN 55426, USA
  • ,
  • William Thomas

      Affiliations

    • Department of Biostatistics, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55414, USA
  • ,
  • Joanne L. Slavin

      Affiliations

    • Department of Food Science and Nutrition, University of Minnesota, MN 55108, USA
    • Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding authors. Tel.: +1 612 624 7234; fax: +1 612 625 5272.

Received 24 November 2008; received in revised form 16 January 2009; accepted 20 January 2009.

Abstract 

Some studies suggest high-fiber foods are more satiating than foods with little or no fiber. However, we hypothesized that certain types of dietary fiber may enhance satiety more than others. Healthy men and women (N = 20) participated in this acute, randomized double-blind, crossover study comparing the effects of 4 fibers and a low-fiber (LF) treatment on satiety. On 5 separate visits, fasting subjects consumed either a LF muffin (1.6 g fiber) or 1 of 4 high-fiber muffins (8.0-9.6 g fiber) for breakfast. The subjects used 4 questions on 100 mm visual analogue scales to rate satiety at baseline and at regular intervals for 180 minutes after muffin consumption. Responses were analyzed as area under the curve and significant differences from baseline. Satiety differed among treatments. Resistant starch and corn bran had the most impact on satiety, whereas polydextrose had little effect and behaved like the LF treatment. Results from this study indicate that not all fibers influence satiety equally.

Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve, BG, barley β-glucan + oat fiber, CB, corn bran, LF, low fiber, RS, resistant starch, VAS, visual analogue scales

Keywords: Satiety, Fiber, Visual analogue scale, Appetite, Hunger

To access this article, please choose from the options below

Login to an existing account or Register a new account.

  • Purchase this article for 31.50 USD (You must login/register to purchase this article)

    Online access for 24 hours. The PDF version can be downloaded as your permanent record.

  • Subscribe to this title

    Get unlimited online access to this article and all other articles in this title 24/7 for one year.

  • Claim access now

    For current subscribers with Society Membership or Account Number.

  • Visit SciVerse ScienceDirect to see if you have access via your institution.
 

PII: S0271-5317(09)00015-3

doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2009.01.004

Nutrition Research
Volume 29, Issue 2 , Pages 100-105, February 2009