Advertisement
Journal Home
Search for

Volume 30, Issue 1, Pages 21-26 (January 2010)


View previous. 3 of 10 View next.

Optimal cutoff value of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol for predicting coronary artery disease in Taiwanese population

Yi-Chia Huanga, Chien-Chang Hob, Ping-Ting Lina, Bor-Jen Leec, Cheng-Hsiu Laid, Yung-Po LiawefCorresponding Author Informationemail address

Received 16 September 2009; received in revised form 12 November 2009; accepted 16 November 2009.

Abstract 

The aim of this study was to determine if an optimal cutoff value for high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) can be obtained for predicting the risk of coronary artery disease (CAD) in Taiwanese population. We conducted a hospital-based case-control study. Patients identified by cardiac catheterization as having at least 70% stenosis of one major coronary artery and without diabetes were assigned to the case group (n = 184). The control group (n = 516) was composed of healthy individuals with normal blood biochemical values. The multiple logistic regression analysis was used to evaluate linear association between low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), HDL-C, or LDL-C/HDL-C ratio and CAD while adjusting for confounders. Furthermore, receiver operating characteristic curve analyses were constructed. Individuals with an HDL-C value less than or equal to 60 mg/dL had the significantly highest odds ratio (7.72; 95% confidence interval, 2.70-22.07) after adjusting for LDL-C, LDL-C/HDL-C ratio, and other potential confounders. The areas under the curves were 0.85 and 0.61 for HDL-C and LDL-C, respectively. The optimal cutoff value of HDL-C for predicting the presence of CAD was 46 mg/dL. Sensitivity and specificity using this cutoff value were 71.74% and 81.40%, respectively. Our findings suggest that subjects with lower levels of HDL-C have a much higher risk of CAD than those with higher levels of LDL-C. The optimal cutoff value for HDL-C in predicting the risk of CAD is considered as 46 mg/dL in the Taiwanese population.

a School of Nutrition, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan

b Doctoral Program in Physical Education, Taipei Physical Education College, Taipei 111, Taiwan

c Intensive Care Unit, Taichung Veterans General Hospital, Taichung 407, Taiwan

d Department and Graduate Institute of Physical Education and Health, Taipei Physical Education College, Taipei 111, Taiwan

e Department of Public Health and Institute of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan

f Department of Family and Community Medicine, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung 402, Taiwan

Corresponding Author InformationCorresponding author. Department of Public Health and Institute of Public Health, Chung Shan Medical University, Taichung 402, Taiwan. Tel.: +886 4 24730022x11794; fax: +886 4 23248179.

PII: S0271-5317(09)00244-9

doi:10.1016/j.nutres.2009.11.003


View previous. 3 of 10 View next.

Advertisement